|
|
|
||||
|
From the publisher website or publicity It was a cold morning, and I was late for work. The A/P database was rejecting logins, and last night’s back-up didn’t happen. That was only the beginning. As I entered the building, the receptionist said, “The CFO is waiting in your office. A field agent from the FBI is with him.” They got right to the point. The FBI was investigating suspected fraud and identity theft. Dozens of depositor accounts at several banks had large withdrawals wired to offshore banks. The account holders were disputing all the withdrawals. Coincidentally, all the account holders were employees, who had arranged direct deposits of their paychecks, from our company. The perpetrator clearly had access to our confidential employee data. As the director of IT security, I had to sort it out. The FBI had many questions; the CIO was reluctantly being interviewed by CNN; my head was on the block, and it was only 9 AM... Exposures to fraud, identity theft and data tampering have become costly, and unfortunately, commonplace events within corporations worldwide. Such events have created an onslaught of legislative mandates, like the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), more stringent corporate governance policies, and privacy regulations to force companies to conduct a more careful analysis of business risk and implement internal controls. And, who do these tasks fall upon? Internal controls, IT security, and auditors.Many companies have resorted to a gambler's approach to testing the proper authorization controls of complex ERP systems. Some assess risk "after-the-fact" through the use of detection solutions that operate on downloaded data; while others invest in incomplete segregation of duties (SoD) solutions that focus on the obvious and overlook the subtleties of ERP systems, fraud or motivated perpetrators; or worse yet, some even make changes before conducting cross-systems analysis to test for violations created by conflicting access across systems. So, how do we ultimately resolve these challenges? Compliance Calibrator&Reg; Overview The ideal solution is to utilize an automated system that provides preventative and detective authorization controls to attest, validate and verify that processes happen the way they are designed, and activities are managed per established policy. By taking a proactive approach to catching violations before they occur and consistently checking controls in real-time, risk is reduced to a minimum. The answer: Virsa's Compliance Calibrator, which delivers real-time, 24/7 "Continuous Compliance" by preventing security and controls violations before they occur. Compliance Calibrator sits within SAP and provides the only real-time solution for risk assessment, simulation and remediation. In addition, with the largest set of validated rules, Compliance Calibrator helps you to perform detailed risk analysis, including SoD to prevent potential conflicts. Real-Time Risk Assessment Provides Continuous Compliance that Saves You Money
Domain Expertise in a Product Package
Comprehensive SoD Analysis to Reduce Risk
|
Keywords
Other tools that may interest you by area:-
Vendor: Virsa |
See our Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, load testing and Financial Glossary pages.
Articles
Books
FAQ Page
home
Jobs
Links
Reviews Page
Tools
Booklist
books
Measurement
Testing
Tools