home

Articles

Blog

Books

Tools

Links

FAQ Page


SEC Chief Account Defends SOX

Google
 
Web www.software-risk.co.uk

The top SEC accountant has defended the decision to make small companies comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. He cited the real benefits the regulator is seeing from companies.

Scott Taub was talking at conference in New York on financial reporting. To back up his argument he quoted figures on the decrease in companies reporting ineffective internal controls.

He contradicted the recommendation from an advisory committee that microcap and smaller companies should be exempted from certain parts of the law.

Particular concer has been expressed about the costs of complying with the infamous Section 404. This deals with internal controls over financial reporting. The clause has been blamed for the huge increase in auditing costs since the legislation was passed in 2002.

"I also find it difficult to conceive of a system of regulation whereby we tell people if you invest in a small company you are going to get less investor protection per dollar invested than if you invest in a large company," Taub said. "That is not a mind-set I've ever really been able to get around.

The SEC.s Advisory Committee on Smaller Public Companies last month voted for a proposal exempting 80% of U.S. companies from some of the acts audit requirements.

"I think all public companies of any size would tell you they recognize the need for internal controls," Taub said. "But then when we get into evaluating the effectiveness of that internal controls system ... they believe the costs outweigh the benefits."

On the subject of costs he blamed the current increase in costs on the basis of extra work over and above required for compliance.

Instead, the evaluating focus of internal controls should be based on areas of greatest risk.

"Chairman (Christopher) Cox has said a couple of times, what he's really focused on is trying to figure out what can we do to make 404 implementable for all companies, so that all investors will receive the type of protection that the Sarbanes-Oxley act envisioned," Taub said.

Related Articles
SEC Proposes Years Exemption on 404
Republican Attack on Sarbanes-Oxley
WebFinancial Cites SOX in Delisting
COX - Sooner Rather than Later on SOX Reform
Caterpillar and Internal Controls
GAO Supports SOX Cost Claims
BIO Lobbying on SOX Again
Small Company Recommendations for SOX

Similar Areas

Sarbanes-Oxley Items

Accounting Items

Regulation Items

US Government Items

Internal Controls Items

Selected Books

Keywords

Sarbanes-Oxley and costs

SEC accountant

internal controls

SOX and internal controls

microcap

small companies

Section 404

Section 404 costs

auditing costs


See our Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, load testing and Financial Glossary pages.
Articles   Books   FAQ Page   home   Jobs   Links   Reviews Page   Tools  
Booklist   books   Measurement   Testing   Tools